A single species, the little penguin, is left on Aussie shores today
Little penguins are the only penguins now found in Australia.
(via Wikicommons)
By
Brian Switek
smithsonian.com
Only one species of penguin currently waddles along Australia’s
southern coast, a semiaquatic bird that is the smallest of all its
family and so tiny that it’s commonly known as the little or fairy penguin.
But in the deep past a greater variety of much more imposing birds
populated this coast. Now, thanks to the fossil record, paleontologists
have discovered that Australia was a refuge for penguin giants.
Penguins are pretty ancient for birds. The oldest, the genus Waimanu
from New Zealand, evolved shortly after the mass extinction that wiped
out its non-avian dinosaur relatives about 66 million years ago. From
there, penguins proliferated throughout the southern hemisphere, but
Australia has always represented a gap in the broader pattern.
“Australian fossil penguins have, until now, been left out of
discussions of global patterns of penguin evolution,” says Monash
University paleontologist Travis Park,
“probably mostly due to the fact the fossil record is a lot more
fragmentary [there] than elsewhere.” By sorting through those pieces and
comparing them to what’s known from other places, however, Park and his
colleagues have now figured out Australia’s role as a holdout for some of the last of the world’s oversize penguins.
Australia was not a prime center for penguin evolution, Park and his colleagues report April 26 in PLOS One.
Instead, the continent was a place where different penguin lineages
landed and then went extinct. The continent hosted an ongoing turnover
of various penguin species over the past 66 million years, including
some of the final ancient giants.
The last of these giants was Anthropodyptes gilli, a species
known from only an upper arm bone. Because these big birds and their
giant brethren are only known from fragments, scientists can only guess
at what they may have looked like. But, Park says, based on more
complete fossils found elsewhere, the largest of these birds would have
stood somewhere between 4.2 and 4.9 feet tall. That’s a bit taller than
the tallest penguins now alive, the emperor penguins.
From left: the humerus of a little penguin, an emperor penguin and a giant penguin
(Travis Park)
All giant penguins went extinct by about 23 million years ago, Park says, except for Anthropodyptes,
which survived until some 18 million years ago. Whether this bird was
the descendant of earlier giants or independently gained its large size
from small ancestors isn’t clear. Either way, this bird would have been
almost tall enough to look you in the eye and was a remnant of an
earlier age of giants that had closed everywhere else.
But how did Australia go from being the last refuge of huge penguins to
home to just one tiny species today? The continent’s shifting place on
the map might be the reason. The Australian and Antarctic plates once butted up against one another.
“Since Australia split from Antarctica in the Cretaceous, it has been
slowly drifting northwards, forming the Southern Ocean” in between, Park
says. As the gap between the two continents got wider and wider, it
became more and more difficult for penguins from Antarctica—or anywhere
else—to reach Australia.
“Sheer isolation,” Park says, provided prehistoric penguins a respite
and also explains why only the fairies are left to waddle across the
same beaches.
New research has used bacteria to show that
acquiring duplicate copies of genes can provide a 'template' allowing
organisms to evolve novel traits from redundant copies of existing
genes.
The evolution of major novel
traits -- characteristics such as wings, flowers, horns or limbs -- has
long been known to play a key role in allowing organisms to exploit new
opportunities in their surroundings.
How did birds get their wings? Bacteria may provide a clue, say scientists.
The evolution of major novel traits -- characteristics such as wings,
flowers, horns or limbs -- has long been known to play a key role in
allowing organisms to exploit new opportunities in their surroundings.
What's still up for debate, though, is how these important augmentations come about from a genetic point of view.
New research from an international team of evolutionary biologists,
led by the University of Oxford, has used bacteria to show that
acquiring duplicate copies of genes can provide a 'template' allowing
organisms to develop new attributes from redundant copies of existing
genes.
Gene duplication has been proposed as playing a key role in
innovation since the 1970s, but these findings add important empirical
evidence to support this theory.
The study, which involved collaboration with researchers from the University of Zurich, is published in the journal PLOS Genetics.
Professor Craig MacLean, a Wellcome Trust Research Fellow in the
Department of Zoology at Oxford University, said: 'The appearance of
novel traits, such as wings and flowers, has played a key role in the
evolution of biological diversity. However, it is usually difficult to
understand the actual genetic changes that drive these evolutionary
innovations.
'We have taken advantage of a simple bacterial model system, where
bacteria evolve the ability to eat new food sources, to overcome this
obstacle.'
The researchers allowed 380 populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
bacteria to evolve novel metabolic traits such as the ability to degrade
new sugars. This gave the researchers the opportunity to witness
evolution happening in real-time.
After 30 days of evolution, they sequenced the genomes of bacteria
that had evolved novel metabolic traits. They found that mutations
mainly affected genes involved in transcription and metabolism, and that
novelty tended to evolve through mutations in pre-existing duplicated
genes in the P. aeruginosa genome.
Duplication drives novelty because genetic redundancy provided by
duplication allows bacteria to evolve new metabolic functions without
compromising existing functions. These findings suggest that past
duplication events might be important for future innovations.
Professor MacLean added: 'The key insight of our study is that having
redundant copies of genes provides bacteria with a template for
evolving new traits without sacrificing existing traits. In other words,
redundant genes allow bacteria to have their cake and eat it.
'In higher organisms like animals and plants, duplicate genes arise
from spontaneous duplication of existing genes. In contrast, bacteria
tend to acquire duplicate genes from neighbouring bacterial cells
through horizontal gene transfer, which is the bacterial equivalent of
sex.
'These findings provide important empirical evidence to support the
role of gene duplication in evolutionary innovation, and they suggest
that it may be possible to predict the ability of pathogenic bacteria to
evolve clinically important traits, such as virulence and antibiotic
resistance.'
Story Source:
The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Oxford. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Journal Reference:
Macarena Toll-Riera, Alvaro San Millan, Andreas Wagner, R. Craig MacLean. The Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Innovation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLOS Genetics, 2016; 12 (5): e1006005 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006005